I'm really hitting the limits of my endurance here. This one goes on for so long you'll have to click to continue, but if you've been reading the ongoing saga of our story with the town of Mashpee where it comes to our two special needs kids, you have to click through.
Shortly after Emmeline started fourth grade we requested that the Quashnet school in Mashpee perform what's called a Functional Behavioral Assessment, or FBA. This is sometimes done for a child who's had conduct problems, but it's particularly important for a child who suffers from an emotional disability like Emmeline.
An FBA is a precursor to another piece of documentation called an BIP, or Behavioral Intervention Plan. In Emmeline's case, Bonnie and I felt that having an FBA and BIP on file would make perfect sense. That way educators and specialists working with her would understand how her behavior affects her ability to learn and interact with teachers and peers, and they would have documentation describing what sort of positive interventions and strategies could be used to elicit good behavior from her, or, at the very least, divert her emotional outbursts from getting worse.
My daughter suffers from bipolar disorder, and she has an explosive, highly reactive personality. Having a BIP on file for her is, in my mind, the same as providing someone with an owner's manual for a complicated piece of equipment that has a chance to blow up in one's face. It only makes sense.
In November we met to discuss the results of the FBA that had been done. Bonnie and I agreed, as did our educational consultant, that the FBA was totally inadequate. First of all, it was done by one of Emme's teachers. FBAs are, by definition, supposed to be done by observation from a third party, preferably a trained psychologist, who witnesses the child's outbursts and tries to get a handle on what's causing them. Someone who's actively teaching her can't very well step outside of his environment and be expected to render an objective observation about the behavior's antecedents, especially if he was involved.
Also, the FBA was incomplete. Entire passages were not done. And the BIP consisted essentially of reiterating the school's punitive measures for dealing with behavior problems. No positive interventions were offered.
So we rejected it totally.
In January a rented psychology for the school (the previous staff psychologist left and got a job in a nearby town after the end of the previous academic year and hasn't been replaced yet) did an FBA, and we've been trying to schedule a meeting to discuss the results since then.
In a nutshell, there was a major screw-up on Friday morning concerning Emmeline's FBA meeting. Here is the history in a nutshell
Joan Collins (yeah, that's her real name) at the Quashnet school had arbitrarily scheduled the FBA meeting for earlier in the week, 3/16. That date wouldn't work. We agreed on Friday at 12:30.
I called our ed consultant to confirm; she said that time was fine. I called Joan back to confirm that time was good. She protested, saying that she already had a meeting scheduled at that time and that she never would have told me 12:30. She then insisted that 9:15 was the time to come in. Fortunately that time worked for Mary too, so it seemed as if we were safe.
When Bonnie and I arrived (apparently a couple of minutes after Stacy and Mary left, we were delayed getting the kids ready for school and because of the weather) we were told by the office secretary that our meeting had been "rescheduled" to 12:30.
Needless to say, Bonnie and I were pissed off beyond belief. We *insisted* that we talk to Joan, right then and there.
At first, she was adamant that she *never* told me 9:15 AM. After several minutes of heated discussion, she recanted and admitted that she may have made a mistake.
I told her that I wanted her to give us some other dates and times by e-mail that would work, and that I'd get back to everyone with the details to see what would work. Bonnie also pointed out that the FBA itself was rife with incomplete passages and that the observer's notes repeated whole passages twice. Joan promised to have the rent-a-psychologist look into it.
Hanlon's Razor is a corollary that says "Never attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity."
It's good advice, in my opinion, and it's a proposition I try to remember at times like this.
But as I explained to the school principal, Jeff Dees, following my argument with Joan, every misstep committed by the Mashpee Schools is seeming less and less like a genuine screw up and more and more like a personal slight aimed directly at us. Honest to God.
There has, from the start, not been a single thing we can point to regarding the special education of our two older children and say, "Yeah, they've handled this well."
Ironically, Jeff, who has been a big part of the problem where our son Robert is concerned, agreed with me. I have to give the man points for his honesty.
Some might call me a perfectionist, I suppose. But I'm just looking for a minimum level of administrative competency here, and the town of Mashpee is coming up sorrowfully short.