Verizon Wireless, you suck
Wanting to take advantage of some of the holiday weekend deals cell phone carriers offered, Bonnie and I got her a new phone over the weekend -- an LG VX9900 (the "enV") through Verizon Wireless.
The VX9900 won out because it has a full keyboard (it's a "candybar" style phone that opens up in the middle, revealing a full QWERTY keyboard and larger screen). We were drawn to it because the device has really remarkable battery life, and it's multimedia compatible.
It's a fine phone, but some of the limitations that Verizon places on wireless customers who use their phones for e-mail and multimedia are making me rethink the purchase, and with 30 days to back out, I very well may.
Verizon is incredibly restrictive about what you can put on the phone. They want a piece of anything you stick there. You can't import ringtones, you can't even import contact information from a PDA. In fact, Verizon wants to charge an extra $20 a month for the privilege (its "wireless sync" feature), which isn't Mac-compatible. Neither is their music syncing software, but she has an iPod, so that's not a huge issue.
I'd not really forgotten about this from my own Verizon experience, but I'd just sort of put it out of my head, I guess, and it's all coming back with a vengeance now.
Now I'm looking hard at AT&T packages. They have a refurbished Palm 750 -- a Treo that runs Windows Mobile -- that I may go with instead. Doesn't look like I'll save anything on the data and voice plan, but them's the breaks, I guess.
The iPhone would be a home run if it were less expensive. $400 is just too much for us to justify on spending on her for a phone -- about $100, maybe $150, if the phone was really compelling, would be the absolute top end.
I hate this.
Comments
Have you looked at the T-Mobile Dash? Thinner than a Treo, runs Windows Mobile, sync whenever you want, standard USB charger, full keyboard, great call quality, speakerphone.
I love mine. It's better than an iPhone, because it also has a SlingPlayer on it. :-)
Posted by: kerri
|
November 26, 2007 04:51 PM
I love my Blackberry 8800; I go through Cingular/ATT but I've had Verizon in the past.
I've also heard good things about the new Centro by Palm, if you like Palm products.
I guess Verizon's "opening" up their network next year to allow any device to "certified" and any application sometime next year, but I doubt it'll be anything worth-while (I'd loved to be proved wrong on that, though).
Anyway, ATT has a refurbed 8800 for 30 bucks more than the refurbed Treo and I honestly think that's such a better deal. You'll be able to sync, load up any ring tones/media you want via the MicroSD slot.
Good luck either way!
Posted by: alexlr
|
November 28, 2007 07:59 PM
Kerri:
Yeah, the stuff from T-Mobile is pretty cool. The big problem with them is that their coverage on the Cape sucks. Really, there are three games in town here: Verizon Wireless, arguably the best of the three in terms of coverage; AT&T; and Sprint. Sprint would be useful if I had other family and friends using Sprint and we had push-to-talk or what-have-you, but I don't know anyone who uses it. It seems mainly restricted to business users on the Cape, near as I can tell.
AT&T's coverage isn't spectacular, but it has gotten a lot better over the past couple of years and continues to improve.
Verizon has the best coverage, no question. It's just that their fascist policies towards data exchange with the phone really turn me off.
Posted by: flargh
|
December 3, 2007 11:18 AM