Bush poll
Poll results published by ABC News look at how Americans have reacted politically to the Katrina disaster. Questions range from how respondents felt about gas prices to whether they were personally affected by Katrina; who they felt was responsible for the slow response and so on.
Much of it falls along political or socioeconomic boundaries, no surprise there, to be sure. Republicans felt that Bush was doing a good job for the most part, most Democrats felt he was doing a lousy job. Non-whites disproportionately suspected that National Guard response was slow because so many of them are deployed in Iraq. One point crossed political boundaries, though: The majority of Democrats and Republicans alike though that petroleum companies and gas station owners were taking advantage of the situation by hiking up gas prices.
All I can say is that if Exxon Mobil and the other major manufacturers report another quarter of record profits, there should be blood in the streets.
The poll's given me some cause for soul-searching, because I definitely don't like Bush's response to Katrina. I don't like Bush to begin with, and never have, so that'll be no surprise to anyone who knows me. But I have to admit that a lot of it comes down to style over substance.
He was days late getting to the region, and only seemed to come reluctantly from his month-long vacation.
When he finally did, he did little more than hug a few people, pat some folks on the back and shake a few bureaucrats' hands to tell them what a great job he thinks they're doing.
That fucking smirk makes me want to scream.
He flip-flopped, to borrow a term, alternately praising and condemning government response to the disaster.
You know, in times of national crisis, you get an immediate, intuitive sense if the guy who's supposed to be running the show is well-informed about what's going on and has a handle on the situation, and at least knows where to direct his attention. I get the distinct feeling watching him that Bush is totally over his head; that he's being fed conflicting information; that he doesn't know who to believe.
In the private sector, I've seen lousy CEOs get fired for a lot less. I just wish it were that easy.
Comments
Amen, brotha. Fire that jackass.
Posted by: lyssa | September 5, 2005 12:31 PM
My god.. 74% of Republicans APPROVE of Bush's performance in this crisis. I don't believe it..
Ignoring it for days, showing up late to do nothing substantial, and FEMA people setting up roadblocks to keep people trapped in New Orleans? This gets approval? And Condi Rice shopping for shoes in NYC in mid week..
They must do brain surgery on new Republicans to modify their behavior, take out any sense of compassion or decency.
Posted by: Alphax | September 5, 2005 02:45 PM
The sad thing is that the administration's horrible performance over the past week, and its dishonesty and cluelessness about that incompetence, has been a microcosm of its performance in general. So if some people actually think Bush and his people are doing a good job handling the devastation of Katrina, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that so many people support him overall. It just makes me wonder what happened to logic and critical thinking in this country -- when even Malkin, Brooks, and Fox News reporters are criticizing and calling for firings, you know it's bad.
Posted by: DF | September 5, 2005 04:20 PM
when even Malkin, Brooks, and Fox News reporters are criticizing and calling for firings, you know it's bad.
Heh, good point. And when Azerbaijan is offering us aid, you know it's bad.
Posted by: flargh | September 5, 2005 05:23 PM
I guess the only thing I'm left wondering is this:
Why weren't more agencies/people ready to roll in to rescue people before/just after the storm? Was it just that unimaginable that the flood walls on Lake Pontchartrain wouldn't hold?
I can understand the city being underwater causing a slow response, but then why wasn't more done before hand?
Just a question that I haven't heard anyone trying to answer.
JDB
Posted by: JDB | September 6, 2005 01:28 PM
I'm with JDB on this. I've heard that there was a census done that showed that something like 100K of NOLA citizens hadn't the ability to evacuate under their own steam. When you order an evacuation, wouldn't it be nice to provide people the means to, I dunno, evacuate?
Posted by: Cameron | September 6, 2005 02:09 PM